Write the Purpose Before You Hire
Define what a specific person must be able to do before you hire, so every proof can be judged by the same finish line.
The first line of the brief says “make it pretty, make it current.” The owner feels the direction has been delivered. The vendor nods. The nod is not two people looking at the same sentence. Each is holding a different month.
The last piece said the next scene is writing the purpose as one sentence. People who hire well, before they get better at choosing a vendor, leave a line a stranger can use to judge done. Without that line a proof opens as taste, and taste cannot end a revision count.
Pretty cannot split pass from return
Pretty, refined, current. The three words carry a mood. Mood makes the room comfortable. A comfortable room can feel that both proofs are right. If both are right, revision becomes the work of lining up months. The month is not in the document.
Done is a verdict. A verdict has a person, an action that person must be able to take, and a place where the action happens. A first-time visitor finds this month’s trial booking on the first screen and picks a date within three steps. Then this round is over. That sentence makes someone place the button. Pretty cannot place it.
People who hire well do not get angry and order the mood words deleted. They have them sit beside the verdict. With a verdict, tone is one revision. Without a verdict, tone opens again every week. A tone that opens every week is not scope. It is a mood.
If a stranger hesitates, the sentence is still mood
After the purpose sentence is written, show only the sentence and the proof to someone who was not in the meeting. Pass, or again. If they answer at once, the sentence works. If they hesitate, a person or an action is missing, or words that still need an interpretation remain. Enough. Our tone.
When hesitation shows, do not take another proof. Fix the sentence. Take another proof, and the hesitation becomes two tastes. A hesitation that became taste gets spoken as the vendor’s fault. It was not a fault. The verdict line was empty.
Small jobs take the same test. A card is done when the receiver reads the trade and the contact in one pass. A menu is done when a first-time guest finds the main price and orders. A short sentence with a person is a verdict. A long sentence with no person is a slogan.
When references write the sentence first
Gather images first, and the purpose sentence copies their mood. A copied sentence cannot judge again. Two people can both be right about the same screen. If right is two, revision looks for the average of tastes. An average is not done.
People who hire well keep references in the seat of direction. Who, where, and what they must be able to do for this round to end comes first. An image is an example of how that line might look. If the example changes the line, the line is mood again.
A meeting where the reference folder was shared first has a signal. The proof arrives as option A and option B, and the body has no criterion for choosing. No criterion means choosing screens while purpose stays empty. Stop the screens and return to the sentence.
Two months pull one proof
The vendor brings last month’s references. We bring this month’s event. Both say current. If the month of current differs, the button’s place differs. The room votes taste on a proof whose place differs. A vote is not done. Done is a visitor picking a date within three steps.
People who hire well erase the month from the sentence. Person, action, place, end. With those four, last month’s reference becomes direction. Without them, the reference becomes the purpose. A reference that became purpose changes the month again on the next proof. A changed month eats the week without eating the revision count.
The same thing happens inside. The owner wants it stronger. The operator wants it softer. If the purpose sentence has a person, the words outside the sentence stay opinions. If it has no person, both are revisions. If both are revisions, the vendor draws the average. An average screen passes nobody’s verdict.
The next proof comes only after the sentence is fixed
Take one more proof on a night of hesitation, and that proof turns the hesitation into a picture. Once it is a picture, the thing to fix is pixels, not the sentence. A week of fixing pixels runs whether or not it serves the purpose. People who hire well do not open that week. They fix only the line, until a stranger can say pass.
The fixed line goes back to the vendor. “If this sentence holds, this round is done.” That mail is what lets the next proof be judged. Wait for the next proof without the mail, and the vendor reads the direction with the most emoji as the finish. A direction read as finish returns later as “this is not our tone.” It was not tone. The sentence was never sent.
When purpose becomes a slogan
If the purpose sentence grows until it sounds like a slogan, the stranger hesitates again. Length does not help a verdict. One person, one verb, one place, one end. Past those four, the rest of the sentence is tone. If tone occupies the purpose cell, scope becomes the work of implementing tone. An implemented tone returns as taste every week.
People who hire well fold the long paragraph into one line and send that line. Only the folded line is the pass condition of the proof. The unfolded paragraph is background. If background is read as a condition, the proof tries to satisfy every adjective and misses the three steps of booking. The missed three steps are the failure of this job. Having kept every adjective is not success.
The night one sentence closes the proof
A proof arrives Wednesday. Emoji piles up in the chat. Someone wants it stronger. Someone wants it softer. If the purpose sentence is on the desk, those two remarks get pushed outside the sentence. A remark pushed outside is an opinion. Only words that stay inside the sentence are a revision.
Without the sentence, emoji becomes the criterion. Emoji that became a criterion calls the next proof with more emoji. People who hire well do not request a new proof that night. They write again, in one line, who must be able to do what for this round to end. The next proof can be judged only when that line exists.
That line is not a vision statement and not a brand slogan. It is the line that lets a stranger say whether this round is over. When it is sharp, the vendor guesses less and the internal taste fight shrinks. Only after the line is sharp does scope have a seat. A long scope alone is a list with no purpose. That list is the next piece.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Can we just say make it pretty?
It sounds like a brief and still cannot split pass from return. Two people can both be right about the same screen.
What about current?
The room has no month for current. If we and the vendor bring different months, revision becomes lining up months.
Does purpose need to be long?
No. Who, what they must be able to do, and whether that ends this round is enough.
What if references go out first?
The sentence copies their mood. A copied sentence cannot judge again.
Why show it to a stranger?
If someone who missed the meeting hesitates, the sentence is still mood. Fix the sentence before taking another proof.
The proof arrived as option A and B.
That is a signal the body has no criterion. Stop the screens and fix the purpose sentence.
If they say it is not our tone, do we rewrite purpose?
Look for a person in the sentence first. If the person is there, one tone pass is enough.
Related updates
What Good Clients Do Differently
Clients who hire well are not better at picking a vendor. They cut the decisions a vendor would otherwise invent.
Read moreBlogWhy Scope Needs a Line for What You Will Not Do
A clear scope needs a clear exclusion. Pair the work that supports the purpose with the closest work that belongs in another round.
Read moreBlogWhy Outsourcing Needs a Decision Owner and Reply Window
Separate production delay from reply delay by naming the final approver, setting a reply window, and defining a backup.
Read more